ReviewPharmaceutical research2006
Why is it challenging to predict intestinal drug absorption and oral bioavailability in human using rat model.
Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 383 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Novel Strategies for Improving the Bioavailability of Docetaxel.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Evaluating Preclinical-to-Human Bioavailability Classification Using Smooth ROC Curve Estimation.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Application of New Approach Methodologies to Improve Oral Biopharmaceutic Assessments.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- PBPK Modelling of PROTACs: Learnings from ARV-110 as a Case Example.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Alternatives to animal models in gastroenterology and hepatology research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Navigating the complexity of oral peptide delivery: challenges and strategies to enhance oral bioavailability.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Toxicity and Safety of Turmeric (Journal of toxicology · 2026Review
- A Sensitive SPE-LC-MS/MS Method for Determination of Selected Veterinary Drugs and Other Organic Contaminants in Human Urine: Development, Validation, and Application Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Ionotropic Gelation and Chemical Crosslinking as Tools to Obtain Gellan Gum-Based Beads with Mesalazine.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Biofabricated 3D Intestinal Models as an Alternative to Animal-Based Approaches for Drug Toxicity Assays.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Olaparib and Regorafenib in an Animal Model.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Characterizing interregional differences in the rheological properties and composition of rat small intestinal mucus.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Article
- Metabolic disrupting chemicals in the intestine: the need for biologically relevant models: Zebrafish: what can we learn from this small environment-sensitive fish?FEBS open bio · 2024Review
- Drug Nanocrystals in Oral Absorption: Factors That Influence Pharmacokinetics.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Parameterization of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models: Workshop Summary Report.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Animal Models for Investigating Osseointegration: An Overview of Implant Research over the Last Three Decades.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Model-Informed Drug Development: In Silico Assessment of Drug Bioperformance following Oral and Percutaneous Administration.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Strategies to Enhance the Solubility and Bioavailability of Tocotrienols Using Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study the correlation of intestinal absorption for drugs with various absorption routes between human and rat, and to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms for the similarity in drug intestinal absorption and the differences in oral bioavailability between human and rat. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe intestinal permeabilities of 14 drugs and three drug-like compounds with different absorption mechanisms in rat and human jejunum were determined by in situ intestinal perfusion. A total of 48 drugs were selected for oral bioavailability comparison. Expression profiles of transporters and metabolizing enzymes in both rat and human intestines (duodenum and colon) were measured using GeneChip analysis.
resultsNo correlation (r(2) = 0.29) was found in oral drug bioavailability between rat and human, while a correlation (r(2) = 0.8) was observed for drug intestinal permeability with both carrier-mediated absorption and passive diffusion mechanisms between human and rat small intestine. Moderate correlation (with r(2) > 0.56) was also found for the expression levels of transporters in the duodenum of human and rat, which provides the molecular mechanisms for the similarity and correlation of drug absorption between two species. In contrast, no correlation was found for the expressions of metabolizing enzymes between rat and human intestine, which indicates the difference in drug metabolism and oral bioavailability in two species. Detailed analysis indicates that many transporters (such as PepT1, SGLT-1, GLUT5, MRP2, NT2, and high affinity glutamate transporter) share similar expression levels in both human and rat with regional dependent expression patterns, which have high expression in the small intestine and low expression in the colon. However, discrepancy was also observed for several other transporters (such as MDR1, MRP3, GLUT1, and GLUT3) in both the duodenum and colon of human and rat. In addition, the expressions of metabolizing enzymes (CYP3A4/CYP3A9 and UDPG) showed 12 to 193-fold difference between human and rat intestine with distinct regional dependent expression patterns.
conclusionsThe data indicate that rat and human show similar drug intestinal absorption profiles and similar transporter expression patterns in the small intestine, while the two species exhibit distinct expression levels and patterns for metabolizing enzymes in the intestine. Therefore, a rat model can be used to predict oral drug absorption in the small intestine of human, but not to predict drug metabolism or oral bioavailability in human.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.