Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16839189›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2006

Human imprinted chromosomal regions are historical hot-spots of recombination.

Ionel Sandovici, Sacha Kassovska-Bratinova, Joe E Vaughan, Rae Stewart, Mark Leppert, Carmen Sapienza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Inflammation and DNA damage: cause, effect or both.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ionel SandoviciFels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sacha Kassovska-Bratinova
Joe E Vaughan
Rae Stewart
Mark Leppert
Carmen Sapienza
Temple University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

VIRAL DAMAGE TO BRAIN AND NEUROMUSCULAR SYSTEMM01RR000064 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SWOBODA, KATHRYN J. · 1985 to 2008
$21.7M
Defining factors causing genome imprint variabilityR21ES011607 · NIEHS · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI SAPIENZA, CARMEN · 2002 to 2003
$301k
EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH FACILITIES CONSTRUCTIONC06RR011234 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MATSEN, JOHN M · 1995 to 1995
–
NCI NIH HHS R21CA11607NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR011234NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000064NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES11607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human recombination rates vary along the chromosomes as well as between the two sexes. There is growing evidence that epigenetic factors may have an important influence on recombination rates, as well as on crossover position. Using both public database analysis and wet-bench approaches, we revisited the relationship between increased rates of meiotic recombination and genome imprinting. We constructed metric linkage disequilibrium (LD) maps for all human chromosomal regions known to contain one or more imprinted genes. We show that imprinted regions contain significantly more LD units (LDU) and have significantly more haplotype blocks of smaller sizes than flanking nonimprinted regions. There is also an excess of hot-spots of recombination at imprinted regions, and this is likely to do with the presence of imprinted genes, per se. These findings indicate that imprinted chromosomal regions are historical "hot-spots" of recombination. We also demonstrate, by direct segregation analysis at the 11p15.5 imprinted region, that there is remarkable agreement between sites of meiotic recombination and steps in LD maps. Although the increase in LDU/Megabase at imprinted regions is not associated with any significant enrichment for any particular sequence class, major sequence determinants of recombination rates seem to differ between imprinted and control regions. Interestingly, fine-mapping of recombination events within the most male meiosis-specific recombination hot-spot of Chromosome 11p15.5 indicates that many events may occur within or directly adjacent to regions that are differentially methylated in somatic cells. Taken together, these findings support the involvement of a combination of specific DNA sequences and epigenetic factors as major determinants of hot-spots of recombination at imprinted chromosomal regions.

Indexed as

Genomic ImprintingRecombination, GeneticChromosomesCpG IslandsDNA MethylationGenomeHumansLinear ModelsLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticMultigene Family

Identifiers

PMID16839189
PMCPMC1487178
OpenAlexW1977481227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.