Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16838027›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2006

The kinetics of reduction of minimal residual disease impacts on duration of response and survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

F Buccisano, L Maurillo, V Gattei, G Del Poeta, M I Del Principe, M C Cox, P Panetta, M Irno Consalvo, C Mazzone, B Neri and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03715621 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Study of Prognostic Values of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Allo-HSCT

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled500ConditionsAcute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT05628623 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Eradicating Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Prior to StEm Cell Transplantation (ERASE): A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEastern Cooperative Oncology GroupRan2024 to 2027Enrolled184ConditionsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteArmsCytarabine, Venetoclax, CPX-351, Azacitidine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Early Peripheral BloodInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

F BuccisanoDepartment of Biopatologia e Diagnostica per Immagini, Policlinico Tor Vergata and Ospedale S Eugenio, Rome, Italy.
L Maurillo
V Gattei
G Del Poeta
M I Del Principe
M C Cox
P Panetta
M Irno Consalvo
C Mazzone
B Neri
L Ottaviani
D Fraboni
A Tamburini
F Lo-Coco
S Amadori
A Venditti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe assessed by multiparametric flow cytometry the levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) in 100 adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) achieving complete remission after intensive chemotherapy. The aim of the study was to determine the optimal threshold, in terms of residual leukemic cells, and the time point of choice, that is, post-induction (post-Ind) or post-consolidation (post-Cons), able to better predict outcome. By applying the maximally selected log-rank statistics, the threshold discriminating MRD- from MRD+ cases was set at 3.5 x 10(-4) residual leukemic cells, a level that allowed the identification of distinct subgroups of patients, both at post-Ind and post-Cons time points. Post-Cons MRD- patients had a superior outcome in terms of relapse rate, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (P<0.001, for all comparisons), regardless of the MRD status after induction. In particular, patients entering MRD negativity only after consolidation showed the same outcome as those achieving early negativity after induction. Multivariate analysis, including karyotype, age, MDR1 phenotype, post-Ind and post-Cons MRD levels, indicated that the post-Cons MRD status independently affected relapse rate, OS and RFS (P<0.001, for all comparisons). IN

conclusion(1) the threshold of 3.5 x 10(-4) is valid in discriminating risk categories in adult AML and (2) post-Cons MRD assessment is critical to predict disease outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunophenotypingKineticsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm, ResidualPredictive Value of TestsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID16838027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.