Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16837929›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2006

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants.

D M Campbell, P S Shah, V Shah, E N Kelly

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00609882 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Neonates

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2007 to 2012Enrolled420ConditionsRespiratory InsufficiencyArmsNasal CPAP, Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHFNC)
NCT03171129 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Adaptive Dynamic Inspiratory Nasal Apparatus (ADINA): Comparison to High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoma Linda UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsRespiratory Distress NeonatalArmsAdaptive Dynamic Inspiratory Nasal Apparatus, High flow Nasal Canula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Peri-extubation settings in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for apnoea of prematurity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. High-flow nasal cannula therapy for respiratory support in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Nasal high flow treatment in preterm infants.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D M CampbellDepartment of Paediatrics, Mt Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. campbelld@smh.toronto.on.ca
P S Shah
V Shah
E N Kelly
University of Toronto · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the feasibility of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support generated by high flow nasal cannula with conventional CPAP for prevention of reintubation among preterm infants with a birth weight of <or=1,250 g. STUDY

designPreterm infants were randomized to CPAP generated via high flow cannula or the Infant Flow Nasal CPAP System (VIASYS, Conshohocken, PA, USA) at extubation. Primary outcome was incidence of reintubation within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included change in oxygen use and frequency of apnea and bradycardias postextubation.

resultsForty neonates were randomized. Twelve of 20 infants randomized to high flow cannula CPAP were reintubated compared to three of 20 using Infant Flow (P=0.003). The high flow cannula group had increased oxygen use and more apneas and bradycardias postextubation.

conclusionsCPAP delivered by high flow nasal cannula failed to maintain extubation status among preterm infants <or=1,250 g as effectively as Infant Flow CPAP.

Indexed as

CatheterizationInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightVentilator WeaningApneaBirth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleOntarioPositive-Pressure RespirationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID16837929
OpenAlexW2013687076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.