ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006
Cluster analysis of protein array results via similarity of Gene Ontology annotation.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-faceted semantic clustering with text-derived phenotypes.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Differential regulation of the immune system in a brain-liver-fats organ network during short-term fasting.Molecular metabolism · 2020Article
- Unsupervised gene selection using biological knowledge : application in sample clustering.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Knowledge Representation in Patient Safety Reporting: An Ontological Approach.Journal of data and information science (Warsaw, Poland) · 2016Article
- Cluster analysis identifies aminoacid compositional features that indicate Toxoplasma gondii adhesin proteins.Bioinformation · 2012Article
- Article
- Learning transcriptional networks from the integration of ChIP-chip and expression data in a non-parametric model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- Multiconstrained gene clustering based on generalized projections.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.PLoS computational biology · 2009Review
- Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2008Article
- A transversal approach to predict gene product networks from ontology-based similarity.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the advent of high-throughput proteomic experiments such as arrays of purified proteins comes the need to analyse sets of proteins as an ensemble, as opposed to the traditional one-protein-at-a-time approach. Although there are several publicly available tools that facilitate the analysis of protein sets, they do not display integrated results in an easily-interpreted image or do not allow the user to specify the proteins to be analysed.
resultsWe developed a novel computational approach to analyse the annotation of sets of molecules. As proof of principle, we analysed two sets of proteins identified in published protein array screens. The distance between any two proteins was measured as the graph similarity between their Gene Ontology (GO) annotations. These distances were then clustered to highlight subsets of proteins sharing related GO annotation. In the first set of proteins found to bind small molecule inhibitors of rapamycin, we identified three subsets containing four or five proteins each that may help to elucidate how rapamycin affects cell growth whereas the original authors chose only one novel protein from the array results for further study. In a set of phosphoinositide-binding proteins, we identified subsets of proteins associated with different intracellular structures that were not highlighted by the analysis performed in the original publication.
conclusionBy determining the distances between annotations, our methodology reveals trends and enrichment of proteins of particular functions within high-throughput datasets at a higher sensitivity than perusal of end-point annotations. In an era of increasingly complex datasets, such tools will help in the formulation of new, testable hypotheses from high-throughput experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.