Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16836631›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2006

Impacts of evidence-based quality improvement on depression in primary care: a randomized experiment.

Lisa V Rubenstein, Lisa S Meredith, Louise E Parker, Nancy P Gordon, Scot C Hickey, Carole Oken, Martin L Lee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00119028 (Expanding and Testing VA Collaborative Care Models for Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00119028 nawithdrawnnot on this map

Expanding and Testing VA Collaborative Care Models for Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorUS Department of Veterans AffairsRan2005 to 2009Enrolled0ConditionsMajor Depression, Post-Traumatic Stress DisorderArmsDepression Care Quality Improvement Implementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Posttraumatic stress disorder collaborative care: A quality improvement study in veterans affairs primary care.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2021
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Integrated Care for Depression in Older Primary Care Patients.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa V RubensteinVA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. lisa_rubenstein@rand.org
Lisa S Meredith
Louise E Parker
Nancy P Gordon
Scot C Hickey
Carole Oken
Martin L Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPrevious studies testing continuous quality improvement (CQI) for depression showed no effects. Methods for practices to self-improve depression care performance are needed. We assessed the impacts of evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI), a modification of CQI, as carried out by 2 different health care systems, and collected qualitative data on the design and implementation process.

objectiveEvaluate impacts of EBQI on practice-wide depression care and outcomes.

designPractice-level randomized experiment comparing EBQI with usual care.

settingSix Kaiser Permanente of Northern California and 3 Veterans Administration primary care practices randomly assigned to EBQI teams (6 practices) or usual care (3 practices). Practices included 245 primary care clinicians and 250,000 patients.

interventionResearchers assisted system senior leaders to identify priorities for EBQI teams; initiated the manual-based EBQI process; and provided references and tools. EVALUATION

participantsFive hundred and sixty-seven representative patients with major depression.

main outcome measuresAppropriate treatment, depression, functional status, and satisfaction.

resultsDepressed patients in EBQI practices showed a trend toward more appropriate treatment compared with those in usual care (46.0% vs 39.9% at 6 months, P = .07), but no significant improvement in 12-month depression symptom outcomes (27.0% vs 36.1% poor depression outcome, P = .18). Social functioning improved significantly (mean score 65.0 vs 56.8 at 12 months, P = .02); physical functioning did not.

conclusionEvidence-based quality improvement had perceptible, but modest, effects on practice performance for patients with depression. The modest improvements, along with qualitative data, identify potential future directions for improving CQI research and practice.

Indexed as

AdultEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID16836631
PMCPMC1831644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.