Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16835759›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2006

Identification of newborns with Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) in weight and/or length based on constitutional growth potential.

Nicole Mamelle, Magali Boniol, Olivier Rivière, Marie O Joly, Georges Mellier, Bernard Maria, Bernard Rousset, Olivier Claris

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole MamelleUMR 369 INSERM / Claude Bernard University-Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology Unit - and IFR62, Research group: Epidemiology of growth and development, Faculté de Médecine Laennec, 8 rue Guillaume Paradin, 69008, Lyon, France.
Magali Boniol
Olivier Rivière
Marie O Joly
Georges Mellier
Bernard Maria
Bernard Rousset
Olivier Claris
Hôpital Edouard Herriot · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRAssociation pour l'Utilisation du Rein Artificiel dans la région Lyonnaise · FRCommunauté urbaine de Lyon · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was carried out to build statistical models for defining FGR (Fetal Growth Restriction) in weight and/or length after taking growth potential of an infant into account. From a cohort of pregnant women having given birth to 47,733 infants in 141 French maternity units, two statistical models gave individualized limits of birth weight and birth length (based on the 5th centile) below which, after adjustment for its individual growth potential, a newborn must be considered as FGR in weight and/or in length. A sample of 906 infants had measures taken of cord blood growth factors (IGF1, IGFBP3). The FGR(W) definition (weight<5th centile for growth potential) permitted the identification of infants who presented rates of maternal hypertension (13.6%) and of Apgar score at 5 min<6 (2.9%) higher than in the classical group SGA(W) (weight<5th centile for sex and gestational age) (9.6% and 2.2% respectively). By combining FGR(W) and SGA(W), a subgroup of infants, not currently recognized as SGA, presented very high rates of maternal hypertension (19.9%) and of low Apgar score (3.9%). Conversely a subgroup of infants, currently recognized as SGA(W), had rates as low as in the normal infants group, and had to be considered as "constitutionally small" (that is to say 24% of the SGA(W)). Combining FGR(W) and FGR(L) (length<5th centile of growth potential), 7.6% of infants appeared growth-restricted, and 1.8% appeared constitutionally small in weight and/or in length. The FGR(W)-FGR(L) infants showed the lowest mean values of IGF1 (126.2+/-3.2) and IGFBP3 (0.86+/-0.03). These new definitions of FGR(W) and FGR(L) could help to better identify infants at birth requiring neonatal care, and monitoring of growth catch-up and neurodevelopmental outcome.

Indexed as

AdultApgar ScoreBody ConstitutionCase-Control StudiesFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetal Growth RetardationFranceHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedInfant, NewbornInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleModels, BiologicalMultivariate AnalysisInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor I

Identifiers

PMID16835759
OpenAlexW1968163772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.