Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16834881›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006

GPs' attitudes to personal continuity: findings from everyday practice differ from postal surveys.

Henk Schers, Hans Bor, Wil van den Bosch, Richard Grol

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What do patients and clinicians think about continuity in general practice in England? a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Up close and personal? Continuing pressure on the doctor-patient relationship in the QOF era.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henk SchersDepartment of General Practice, UMC St Radboud, Geert Grooteplein Noord 21, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. H.Schers@hag.umcn.nl
Hans Bor
Wil van den Bosch
Richard Grol

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a study in which we measured GPs' attitudes towards personal continuity directly after consultations, and identified which factors predicted its perceived importance. Moreover, we related these data to attitudes as measured by a postal survey. GPs varied considerably in their attitudes towards personal continuity. Continuity was valued for serious and psychosocial issues and also for routine checks for a chronic illness. There was no relation whatsoever between the importance that individual GPs attached to continuity after consultations, and their scores on the postal survey.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysician-Patient RelationsContinuity of Patient CareFamily PracticeHealth Care SurveysHumansNetherlandsReferral and ConsultationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID16834881
PMCPMC1872065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.