Up close and personal? Continuing pressure on the doctor-patient relationship in the QOF era.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Relationship continuity: when and why do primary care patients think it is safer?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
   Article
2. Do the Quality and Outcomes Framework patient experience indicators reward practices that offer improved access?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
   Article
3. Distilling the essence of general practice: a learning journey in progress.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
   Article
4. Effect of the new contract on GPs' working lives and perceptions of quality of care: a longitudinal survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
   Article
5. Quality in general practice consultations; a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland.BMC family practice · 2007
   Article
6. Interpersonal continuity of care: a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients' preferences and their experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Patients' experiences of continuity in the care of type 2 diabetes: a focus group study in primary care.2006
• Comment on
  Patients' experiences of GP consultations for psychological problems: a qualitative study.2006
• Comment on
  GPs' attitudes to personal continuity: findings from everyday practice differ from postal surveys.2006

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as