ArticleBiology direct2006
Rooting the tree of life by transition analyses.
Article in Biology direct, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 223 citations in OpenAlex.
- Universal paralogs provide a window into evolution before the last universal common ancestor.Cell genomics · 2026Review
- Cell surface polysaccharides in the gut microbiota: occurrence, structure and role.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Cell envelope diversity and evolution across the bacterial tree of life.Nature microbiology · 2024Review
- Illuminating the coevolution of photosynthesis and Bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The Name Is Barrel, β-Barrel.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- ATP synthase evolution on a cross-braced dated tree of life.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Identification of a deep-branching thermophilic clade sheds light on early bacterial evolution.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Evolving Perspective on the Origin and Diversification of Cellular Life and the Virosphere.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Review
- Review
- Phylogenetic Signal, Congruence, and Uncertainty across Bacteria and Archaea.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- Evidence for a chromosome origin unwinding system broadly conserved in bacteria.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Metagenomics Analysis Reveals an Extraordinary Inner Bacterial Diversity in Anisakids (Nematoda: Anisakidae) L3 Larvae.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Genome-wide analysis of the Firmicutes illuminates the diderm/monoderm transition.Nature ecology & evolution · 2020Article
- Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria).Protoplasma · 2020Review
- Cryo-Electron Tomography Reveals the Complex Ultrastructural Organization of Multicellular FilamentousFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Phylogenomics provides robust support for a two-domains tree of life.Nature ecology & evolution · 2020Article
- Descent of Bacteria and Eukarya From an Archaeal Root of Life.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020Article
- Phylogenomics of 10,575 genomes reveals evolutionary proximity between domains Bacteria and Archaea.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Investigating the Origins of Membrane Phospholipid Biosynthesis Genes Using Outgroup-Free Rooting.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite great advances in clarifying the family tree of life, it is still not agreed where its root is or what properties the most ancient cells possessed--the most difficult problems in phylogeny. Protein paralogue trees can theoretically place the root, but are contradictory because of tree-reconstruction artefacts or poor resolution; ribosome-related and DNA-handling enzymes suggested one between neomura (eukaryotes plus archaebacteria) and eubacteria, whereas metabolic enzymes often place it within eubacteria but in contradictory places. Palaeontology shows that eubacteria are much more ancient than eukaryotes, and, together with phylogenetic evidence that archaebacteria are sisters not ancestral to eukaryotes, implies that the root is not within the neomura. Transition analysis, involving comparative/developmental and selective arguments, can polarize major transitions and thereby systematically exclude the root from major clades possessing derived characters and thus locate it; previously the 20 shared neomuran characters were thus argued to be derived, but whether the root was within eubacteria or between them and archaebacteria remained controversial.
resultsI analyze 13 major transitions within eubacteria, showing how they can all be congruently polarized. I infer the first fully resolved prokaryote tree, with a basal stem comprising the new infrakingdom Glidobacteria (Chlorobacteria, Hadobacteria, Cyanobacteria), which is entirely non-flagellate and probably ancestrally had gliding motility, and two derived branches (Gracilicutes and Unibacteria/Eurybacteria) that diverged immediately following the origin of flagella. Proteasome evolution shows that the universal root is outside a clade comprising neomura and Actinomycetales (proteates), and thus lies within other eubacteria, contrary to a widespread assumption that it is between eubacteria and neomura. Cell wall and flagellar evolution independently locate the root outside Posibacteria (Actinobacteria and Endobacteria), and thus among negibacteria with two membranes. Posibacteria are derived from Eurybacteria and ancestral to neomura. RNA polymerase and other insertions strongly favour the monophyly of Gracilicutes (Proteobacteria, Planctobacteria, Sphingobacteria, Spirochaetes). Evolution of the negibacterial outer membrane places the root within Eobacteria (Hadobacteria and Chlorobacteria, both primitively without lipopolysaccharide): as all phyla possessing the outer membrane beta-barrel protein Omp85 are highly probably derived, the root lies between them and Chlorobacteria, the only negibacteria without Omp85, or possibly within Chlorobacteria.
conclusionChlorobacteria are probably the oldest and Archaebacteria the youngest bacteria, with Posibacteria of intermediate age, requiring radical reassessment of dominant views of bacterial evolution. The last ancestor of all life was a eubacterium with acyl-ester membrane lipids, large genome, murein peptidoglycan walls, and fully developed eubacterial molecular biology and cell division. It was a non-flagellate negibacterium with two membranes, probably a photosynthetic green non-sulphur bacterium with relatively primitive secretory machinery, not a heterotrophic posibacterium with one membrane.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.