Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16831228›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2006

The effect of giving influenza vaccination to general practitioners: a controlled trial [NCT00221676].

Barbara Michiels, Hilde Philips, Samuel Coenen, Fernande Yane, Toon Steinhauser, Sofie Stuyck, Joke Denekens, Paul Van Royen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00221676 (Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00221676 phase4completednot on this map

Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination (Alfarix)in Preventing Clinical Influenza Cases Among General Practitioners: Non-Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AntwerpRan2002 to 2004Enrolled300ConditionsInfluenzaArmsAlfarix
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. E-mail-based symptomatic surveillance combined with self-collection of nasal swabs: a new tool for acute respiratory infection epidemiology.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara MichielsDepartment of Family Medicine, Centre for General Practice, University of Antwerp, University of Antwerp - Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium. barbara.michiels@pandora.be
Hilde Philips
Samuel Coenen
Fernande Yane
Toon Steinhauser
Sofie Stuyck
Joke Denekens
Paul Van Royen
University of Antwerp · BEFund for Scientific Research · BEInstitut Scientifique de Santé Publique · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo efficacy studies of influenza vaccination given to GPs have yet been published. Therefore, our purpose was to assess the effect of an inactivated influenza vaccine given to GPs on the rate of clinical respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and proven influenza cases (influenza positive nose and throat swabs and a 4-fold titre rise), while adjusting for important covariates.

methodsIn a controlled trial during two consecutive winter periods (2002-2003 and 2003-2004) we compared (77 and 100) vaccinated with (45 and 40) unvaccinated GPs working in Flanders, Belgium. Influenza antibodies were measured immediately prior to and 3-5 weeks after vaccination, as well as after the influenza epidemic. During the influenza epidemic, GPs had to record their contact with influenza cases and their own RTI symptoms every day. If they became ill, the GPs had to take nose and throat swabs during the first 4 days. We performed a multivariate regression analysis for covariates using Generalized Estimating Equations.

resultsOne half of the GPs (vaccinated or not) developed an RTI during the 2 influenza epidemics. During the two influenza periods, 8.6% of the vaccinated and 14.7% of the unvaccinated GPs had positive swabs for influenza (RR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.28 - 1.24). Multivariate analysis revealed that influenza vaccination prevented RTIs and swab-positive influenza only among young GPs (ORadj: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.13 - 0.96 and 0.1; 0.01 - 0.75 respectively for 30-year-old GPs). Independent of vaccination, a low basic antibody titre against influenza (ORadj 0.57; 95%CI: 0.37 - 0.89) and the presence of influenza cases in the family (ORadj 9.24; 95%CI: 2.91 - 29) were highly predictive of an episode of swab-positive influenza.

conclusionInfluenza vaccination was shown to protect against proven influenza among young GPs. GPs, vaccinated or not, who are very vulnerable to influenza are those who have a low basic immunity against influenza and, in particular, those who have family members who develop influenza.

Indexed as

Physicians, FamilyBelgiumCross InfectionHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMultivariate AnalysisRegression AnalysisRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID16831228
PMCPMC1538610
OpenAlexW2166599478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.