Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16830227›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2006

Insights into recognition of the T-DNA border repeats as termination sites for T-strand synthesis by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Nancy Podevin, Sylvie De Buck, Chris De Wilde, Anna Depicker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Studies on Pure MlbFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. An Insight into T-DNA Integration Events in Medicago sativa.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy PodevinDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Ghent University, Technologiepark 927, B-9052 Gent, Belgium.
Sylvie De Buck
Chris De Wilde
Anna Depicker
Ghent University · BEVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recognition of the T-DNA left border (LB) repeat is affected by its surrounding sequences. Here, the LB regions were further characterized by molecular analysis of transgenic plants, obtained after Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation with T-DNA vectors that had been modified in this LB region. At least the 24-bp LB repeat by itself was insufficient to terminate the T-strand synthesis. Addition of the natural inner and/or outer border regions to at least the LB repeat, even when present at a distance, enhanced the correct recognition of the LB repeat, reducing the number of plants containing vector backbone sequences. In tandem occurrence of both the octopine and nopaline LB regions with their repeats terminated the T-strand synthesis most efficiently at the LB, yielding a reproducibly high number of plants containing only the T-DNA. Furthermore, T-strand synthesis did not terminate efficiently at the right border (RB) repeat, which might indicate that signals in the outer RB region inhibit the termination of T-strand synthesis at the RB repeat.

Indexed as

Plants, Genetically ModifiedRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAgrobacterium tumefaciensArabidopsisDNA, BacterialDNA, PlantGenetic VectorsDNA, BacterialDNA, PlantT-DNA

Identifiers

PMID16830227
OpenAlexW1984547110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.