ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2006
Surgical treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening for oesophageal cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Esophageal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- The role of ICG NIRL fluorescence imaging in the surgical treatment of digestive system tumors (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
- Lymph Node Metastasis for pN+ Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- The current state of artificial intelligence in endoscopic diagnosis of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Pericancerous lymph node imaging with indocyanine green-guided near-infrared fluorescence in radical esophagectomy: Protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular disease related death among patients with esophagus cancer: A population-based competing risk analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The value of enhanced CT scanning for predicting lymph node metastasis along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Recommendation for the definition of postoperative radiotherapy target volume based on a pooled analysis of patterns of failure after radical surgery among patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Extent of Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017Article
- Prediction of the invasion depth of superficial squamous cell carcinoma based on microvessel morphology: magnifying endoscopic classification of the Japan Esophageal Society.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2017Article
- Clinicopathologic analysis of lymph node status in superficial esophageal squamous carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2016Article
- Global metabolomics reveals potential urinary biomarkers of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for diagnosis and staging.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Right versus left transthoracic approach for lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2015Article
- CC-Chemokine receptor CCR7: a key molecule for lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2014Article
- Article
- Transthoracic esophagectomy after endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with early esophageal carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2009Article
- Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma.Surgical endoscopy · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe worldwide incidence of superficial esophageal cancer (SEC) is increasing. The aim of this study is to review the systematic surgical outcomes of esophagectomy for SEC. DATA SOURCES: Only manuscripts written in English and written between 1980 and 2003 were selected from MEDLINE. The keywords consisting of superficial esophageal cancer, early esophageal cancer, and early stage or superficial stage or stage I in esophageal cancer were searched. STUDY SELECTION: There were no exclusion criteria for published information relevant to the topics. The most representative articles were selected when there were several articles from the same institution. Case reports were excluded. DATA EXTRACTIONS: Thirty-two manuscripts were finally collected from MEDLINE and eight articles were also added from reference lists of the pertinent literatures. In evaluating the statistical analysis of the complications of the reported literature, collective method was used. DATA SYNTHESIS: The collected information was organized.
conclusionsThe conclusions drawn from those articles showed that the overall prevalence of SEC accounted around 10% and increased to 25% in the 2000s. The overall incidence of lymph node metastasis of SEC was about 25% and its incidences in mucosal and submucosal cancer were 5 and 35%, respectively. The percentage of the cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) vs adenocarcinoma (AC) widely varied depending on the geographic locations reported; most SCC cases were from the Asian countries and most AC cases were from the European countries. Clinical significance of multimodal treatment for SEC has dramatically developed in the recent era and could provide various potential therapeutic options for SEC. These concepts make it possible to individualize surgical management of SEC as part of various multimodal treatments. The operative approaches for SEC varied from minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy, limited transabdominal distal esophagectomy, conventional transthoracic esophagectomy, transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy, en bloc esophagectomy, and to extended esophagectomy with a complete three-field lymph node dissection. A 5-year overall survival rate of SEC after esophagectomy was good (46 to 83%) to excellent (71 and 100%) for mucosal SEC, but far from satisfactory (33 and 78%) for submucosal SEC. Early diagnosis, development of multimodal treatment, standardization of the surgical procedure including routine lymph node dissection, and improved perioperative management of patients have led to a better survival for patients with SEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.