Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16830097›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2006

Sequence of the tomato chloroplast DNA and evolutionary comparison of solanaceous plastid genomes.

Sabine Kahlau, Sue Aspinall, John C Gray, Ralph Bock

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. SlPPR138-mediated RNA editing ofHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  7. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Plastid Transformation in Tomato: A Vegetable Crop and Model Species.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  20. Plastid Genomes of Flowering Plants: Essential Principles.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabine KahlauMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Am Mühlenberg 1, Potsdam-Golm, D-14476, Germany.
Sue Aspinall
John C Gray
Ralph Bock
University of Cambridge · GBMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology · DEMax Planck Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tomato, Solanum lycopersicum (formerly Lycopersicon esculentum), has long been one of the classical model species of plant genetics. More recently, solanaceous species have become a model of evolutionary genomics, with several EST projects and a tomato genome project having been initiated. As a first contribution toward deciphering the genetic information of tomato, we present here the complete sequence of the tomato chloroplast genome (plastome). The size of this circular genome is 155,461 base pairs (bp), with an average AT content of 62.14%. It contains 114 genes and conserved open reading frames (ycfs). Comparison with the previously sequenced plastid DNAs of Nicotiana tabacum and Atropa belladonna reveals patterns of plastid genome evolution in the Solanaceae family and identifies varying degrees of conservation of individual plastid genes. In addition, we discovered several new sites of RNA editing by cytidine-to-uridine conversion. A detailed comparison of editing patterns in the three solanaceous species highlights the dynamics of RNA editing site evolution in chloroplasts. To assess the level of intraspecific plastome variation in tomato, the plastome of a second tomato cultivar was sequenced. Comparison of the two genotypes (IPA-6, bred in South America, and Ailsa Craig, bred in Europe) revealed no nucleotide differences, suggesting that the plastomes of modern tomato cultivars display very little, if any, sequence variation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceChromosome MappingDNA, ChloroplastDNA, PlantGenes, PlantGenome, PlantMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlastidsRibosomal ProteinsRNA EditingRNA, PlantRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, ChloroplastDNA, Plantribosomal protein L16Ribosomal ProteinsRNA, PlantRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID16830097
OpenAlexW2016437536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.