Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16829980›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2006

The biogenesis and regulation of telomerase holoenzymes.

Kathleen Collins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How to measure and model cardiovascular aging.Cardiovascular research · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Comparison of Telomere Structure in Eukaryotes.Archives of Razi Institute · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Pathomechanisms of Prenatally Programmed Adult Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nematode chromosomes.Genetics · 2022
    Review
  16. Telomerase gene therapy: a remission toward cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kathleen CollinsDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3204, USA. kcollins@berkeley.edu

Funding

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF TELOMERASER01GM054198 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI COLLINS, KATHLEEN · 1996 to 2018
$5.4M
Molecular Mechanism of X-linked Dyskeratosis CongenitaR01HL079585 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI COLLINS, KATHLEEN · 2004 to 2017
$4.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL079585NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome stability requires a dynamic balance of DNA loss and gain in each terminal tract of telomeric repeats. Repeat addition by a specialized reverse transcriptase, telomerase, has an important role in maintaining this equilibrium. Insights that have been gained into the cellular pathways for biogenesis and regulation of telomerase ribonucleoproteins raise new questions, particularly concerning the dynamic nature of this unique polymerase.

Indexed as

Chromosomal InstabilityChromosomes, FungalDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHoloenzymesHumansRibonucleoproteinsRNATelomeraseTelomereDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHoloenzymesRibonucleoproteinsRNATelomerase

Identifiers

PMID16829980
PMCPMC2915765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.