Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16825512›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2006

A consensus on fungal polymerase chain reaction diagnosis?: a United Kingdom-Ireland evaluation of polymerase chain reaction methods for detection of systemic fungal infections.

P Lewis White, Richard Barton, Malcolm Guiver, Christopher J Linton, Steve Wilson, Melvyn Smith, Beatriz L Gomez, Michael J Carr, Patrick T Kimmitt, Shila Seaton and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aspergillus Polymerase Chain Reaction: Systematic Review of Evidence for Clinical Use in Comparison With Antigen Testing.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Diagnosis of Yeast Infections.Current fungal infection reports · 2021
    Review
  6. Quantification ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  7. Identification of Mycoses in Developing Countries.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

P Lewis WhiteDepartment of Medical Microbiology and NPHS Cardiff, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK. lewis.white@nphs.wales.nhs.uk
Richard Barton
Malcolm Guiver
Christopher J Linton
Steve Wilson
Melvyn Smith
Beatriz L Gomez
Michael J Carr
Patrick T Kimmitt
Shila Seaton
Kumar Rajakumar
Tessa Holyoake
Chris C Kibbler
Elizabeth Johnson
Richard P Hobson
Brian Jones
Rosemary A Barnes
University College London · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBHeartlands Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital · GBLeeds General Infirmary · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBTrinity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limitations of classical diagnostic methods for invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have led to the development of molecular techniques to aid in the detection of IFIs. Despite good published performance, interlaboratory reproduction of these assays is variable, and no consensus has been reached for an optimal method. This publication describes the first multicenter study of polymerase chain reaction methods, for the detection of Aspergillus and Candida species, currently used in the UK and Ireland by distribution and analysis of multiple specimen control panels. All three Candida methods were comparable, achieving a satisfactory level of detection (10 cfu), and the method of preference was dependent on the requirements of the particular laboratory. The results for the five Aspergillus assays were more variable, but two methods (2Asp and 4Asp) were superior (10(1) conidia). Formally, the overall performances of the two Aspergillus assays were comparable (kappa statistic = 0.77). However, on the Roche LightCycler, there was a clear sample-type effect that greatly reduced the detection limit of the 4Asp method when testing whole blood samples. Therefore, the preferred Aspergillus method relied on the amplification platform available to the user. This study represents the initial process to achieve a consensus method for the diagnosis of IFIs.

Indexed as

AspergillosisBase SequenceCandidiasisConsensusDNA, FungalHumansIrelandMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular Sequence DataMycosesPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Homology, Nucleic AcidUnited KingdomDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID16825512
PMCPMC1867606
OpenAlexW1740224572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.