Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16825375›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Illustration of a common framework for relating multiple typing methods by application to macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes.

J A Carriço, C Silva-Costa, J Melo-Cristino, F R Pinto, H de Lencastre, J S Almeida, M Ramirez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of veterinary research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic Diversity of Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Evaluation of IR BIOTYPERAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of aFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Rapid typing ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The emergence of carbapenemase-producingFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J A CarriçoGrupo de Biomatemática, Istituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Quinta Grande 6 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal. jcarrico@itqb.unl.pt
C Silva-Costa
J Melo-Cristino
F R Pinto
H de Lencastre
J S Almeida
M Ramirez

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The studies that correlate the results obtained by different typing methodologies rely solely on qualitative comparisons of the groups defined by each methodology. We propose a framework of measures for the quantitative assessment of correspondences between different typing methods as a first step to the global mapping of type equivalences. A collection of 325 macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes isolates associated with pharyngitis cases in Portugal was used to benchmark the proposed measures. All isolates were characterized by macrolide resistance phenotyping, T serotyping, emm sequence typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), using SmaI or Cfr9I and SfiI. A subset of 41 isolates, representing each PFGE cluster, was also characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The application of Adjusted Rand and Wallace indices allowed the evaluation of the strength and the directionality of the correspondences between the various typing methods and showed that if PFGE or MLST data are available one can confidently predict the emm type (Wallace coefficients of 0.952 for both methods). In contrast, emm typing was a poor predictor of PFGE cluster or MLST sequence type (Wallace coefficients of 0.803 and 0.655, respectively). This was confirmed by the analysis of the larger data set available from http://spyogenes.mlst.net and underscores the necessity of performing PFGE or MLST to unambiguously define clones in S. pyogenes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial Typing TechniquesCarrier ProteinsCluster AnalysisDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingDrug Resistance, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHumansMacrolidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPharyngitisPortugalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCCCGGG-specific type II deoxyribonucleasesDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, Bacterialendodeoxyribonuclease SfiIMacrolidesstreptococcal M protein

Identifiers

PMID16825375
PMCPMC1489512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.