Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16825366›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Comparative study of the epidemiology of rotavirus in children from a community-based birth cohort and a hospital in South India.

Indrani Banerjee, Sasirekha Ramani, Beryl Primrose, Prabhakar Moses, Miren Iturriza-Gomara, James J Gray, Shabbar Jaffar, Bindhu Monica, Jaya Prakash Muliyil, David W Brown and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diagnosis of viral gastroenteritis in children: interpretation of real-time PCR results and relation to clinical symptoms.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Indrani BanerjeeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632004, India.
Sasirekha Ramani
Beryl Primrose
Prabhakar Moses
Miren Iturriza-Gomara
James J Gray
Shabbar Jaffar
Bindhu Monica
Jaya Prakash Muliyil
David W Brown
Mary K Estes
Gagandeep Kang
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INBaylor College of Medicine · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700837Wellcome Trust 063144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotavirus gastroenteritis is the major cause of severe dehydrating diarrhea in children worldwide. This study compares rotavirus diarrhea in 351 children in a community-based cohort and 343 children admitted to a hospital during the same period. Clinical information and fecal specimens were obtained during diarrheal episodes. Fecal samples were screened for VP6 antigen, and the positive samples were G and P typed by reverse transcription-PCR. Rotavirus was detected in 82/1,152 (7.1%) episodes of diarrhea in the community and 94/343 (27.4%) cases in the hospital. The median age of affected children (7.5 versus 10.5 months) and the mean severity of symptoms (Vesikari score, 7.6+/-3.4 versus 11+/-2.5) were lower in the community. A larger proportion of children in the community were breast-fed than were children admitted to the hospital (73% versus 34.8%). In the community, the genotypes identified in symptomatic patients, in order of frequency, were G1 (36.5%), G10 (17.1%), G2 (15.9%), and G9 (7.3%) and mixed infections (7.3%). The most common G-P combinations were G1P[8], G2P[4], G1P[4], and G10P[11]. The distribution of G types from hospitalized children was G1 (46.8%), G9 (19.1%), G2 (8.5%), G10 (1.1%), and 4.3% mixed infections. The most common G-P combinations were G1P[8] and G9P[8]. This study documents significant genetic heterogeneity of rotaviruses in the community and the hospital. G10P[11] strains resembling a vaccine candidate strain caused disease in the community, indicating the need for careful epidemiological studies as well as safety studies for the vaccine candidates.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAge FactorsAntigens, ViralBreast FeedingCapsid ProteinsChild, PreschoolCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDiarrheaFecesFemaleGenotypeHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsRNA, ViralViral ProteinsVP6 protein, Rotavirus

Identifiers

PMID16825366
PMCPMC1489461
OpenAlexW2047062528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.