Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16825231›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006

Testing pitfalls and summary of guidance in lipid management.

W Stuart A Smellie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Occupation-Induced Fatigue and Impacts on Emergency First Responders: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. A Modern Approach to Dyslipidemia.Endocrine reviews · 2022
    Article
  6. Quantitative analysis of heterogeneity in academic achievement of children with autism.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2019
    Article
  7. Rhabdomyolysis with simvastatin.BMJ case reports · 2011
    Article
  8. Best practice in primary care pathology: review 7.Journal of clinical pathology · 2007
    Review
  9. Spurious hyperkalaemia.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Review
  10. Hypertriglyceridaemia in diabetes.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

W Stuart A SmellieClinical Laboratory, General Hospital, Bishop Auckland DL14 6AD. info@smellie.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesHumansHyperlipidemiasHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsPractice Guidelines as TopicReferral and ConsultationHypolipidemic AgentsLipids

Identifiers

PMID16825231
PMCPMC1489213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.