ReviewDrugs & aging2006
Verteporfin: a review of its use in the management of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Light-triggered switching of liposome surface charge directs delivery of membrane impermeable payloads in vivo.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Regulation of the Ocular Cell/Tissue Response by Implantable Biomaterials and Drug Delivery Systems.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Nanocarriers for the Delivery of Medical, Veterinary, and Agricultural Active Ingredients.ACS nano · 2020Review
- Biotechnology and Biomaterial-Based Therapeutic Strategies for Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Part I: Biomaterials-Based Drug Delivery Devices.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Nanotechnology for photodynamic therapy: a perspective from the Laboratory of Dr. Michael R. Hamblin in the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School.Nanotechnology reviews · 2015Article
- Phototriggerable liposomes: current research and future perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin (Visudyne), a photosensitising protoporphyrin derivative, is used in the management of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or pathological myopia (PM). PDT with verteporfin over 1 and 2 years reduces the decline in visual acuity in patients with classic-containing subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD. Verteporfin is generally well tolerated by most patients. Verteporfin is also effective in patients with CNV secondary to PM, although data in this indication are limited and further controlled studies are required. Although verteporfin has shown efficacy in patients with occult AMD-related subfoveal CNV lesions in early trials, data are currently limited on its first-line use in this indication; fully published data from the Verteporfin In Occult (VIO) trial are therefore awaited with interest. Verteporfin should be considered as a first-line treatment in patients with predominantly classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, and in patients with smaller minimally classic subfoveal CNV lesions. It may also be considered an option for the treatment of patients with occult AMD-related subfoveal CNV in whom visual acuity decreases or predominantly classic features develop over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.