Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16822921›Full record

ReviewPostgraduate medical journal2006

When is arthritis reactive?

S S Hamdulay, S J Glynne, A Keat

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postgraduate medical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bilateral sacroiliitis following group C streptococcal sepsis.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolving patterns of reactive arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S S HamdulayDepartment of Rheumatology, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK. hamdu@hotmail.com
S J Glynne
A Keat
Northwick Park Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactive arthritis is an important cause of lower limb oligoarthritis, mainly in young adults. It is one of the spondyloarthropathy family; it is distinguishable from other forms of inflammatory arthritis by virtue of the distribution of affected sites and the high prevalence of characteristic extra-articular lesions. Many terms have been used to refer to this and related forms of arthritis leading to some confusion. Reactive arthritis is precipitated by an infection at a distant site and genetic susceptibility is marked by possession of the HLA-B27 gene, although the mechanism remains uncertain. Diagnosis is a two stage process and requires demonstration of a temporal link with a recognised "trigger" infection. The identification and management of "sexually acquired" and "enteric" forms of reactive arthritis are considered. Putative links with HIV infection are also discussed. The clinical features, approach to investigation, diagnosis, and management of reactive arthritis are reviewed.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsArthritis, ReactiveDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMedical History TakingPhysical ExaminationPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSpondylarthropathiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents

Identifiers

PMID16822921
PMCPMC2563769
OpenAlexW2144101480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.