Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16822041›Full record

ArticleChaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)2006

Stability of discrete memory states to stochastic fluctuations in neuronal systems.

Paul Miller, Xiao-Jing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Brain mechanism of foraging: Reward-dependent synaptic plasticity versus neural integration of values.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Mean Field Approach for Populations of Spiking Neurons.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Itinerancy between attractor states in neural systems.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016
    Review
  8. Computational principles of memory.Nature neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  9. DOC2B and Munc13-1 differentially regulate neuronal network activity.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Heterogeneous attractor cell assemblies for motor planning in premotor cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  12. Neural dynamics and circuit mechanisms of decision-making.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2012
    Review
  13. The molecular basis of memory.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Stochastic transitions between neural states in taste processing and decision-making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul MillerVolen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA. pmiller@brandeis.edu
Xiao-Jing Wang

Funding

Network requirements for parametric working memoryK25MH064497 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, PAUL · 2002 to 2006
$324k
NIMH NIH HHS K25 MH064497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noise can degrade memories by causing transitions from one memory state to another. For any biological memory system to be useful, the time scale of such noise-induced transitions must be much longer than the required duration for memory retention. Using biophysically-realistic modeling, we consider two types of memory in the brain: short-term memories maintained by reverberating neuronal activity for a few seconds, and long-term memories maintained by a molecular switch for years. Both systems require persistence of (neuronal or molecular) activity self-sustained by an autocatalytic process and, we argue, that both have limited memory lifetimes because of significant fluctuations. We will first discuss a strongly recurrent cortical network model endowed with feedback loops, for short-term memory. Fluctuations are due to highly irregular spike firing, a salient characteristic of cortical neurons. Then, we will analyze a model for long-term memory, based on an autophosphorylation mechanism of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) molecules. There, fluctuations arise from the fact that there are only a small number of CaMKII molecules at each postsynaptic density (putative synaptic memory unit). Our results are twofold. First, we demonstrate analytically and computationally the exponential dependence of stability on the number of neurons in a self-excitatory network, and on the number of CaMKII proteins in a molecular switch. Second, for each of the two systems, we implement graded memory consisting of a group of bistable switches. For the neuronal network we report interesting ramping temporal dynamics as a result of sequentially switching an increasing number of discrete, bistable, units. The general observation of an exponential increase in memory stability with the system size leads to a trade-off between the robustness of memories (which increases with the size of each bistable unit) and the total amount of information storage (which decreases with increasing unit size), which may be optimized in the brain through biological evolution.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsBiological ClocksCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein KinasesCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Computer SimulationHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalLong-Term PotentiationMemoryModels, StatisticalNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityStochastic ProcessesSynaptic TransmissionCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein KinasesCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2

Identifiers

PMID16822041
PMCPMC3897304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.