Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16821139›Full record

ReviewChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2006

Drosophila under the lens: imaging from chromosomes to whole embryos.

Cornelia Fritsch, Ginette Ploeger, Donna J Arndt-Jovin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pairing and anti-pairing: a balancing act in the diploid genome.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Condensins and 3D Organization of the Interphase Nucleus.Current genetic medicine reports · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Meiosis in male Drosophila.Spermatogenesis · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cornelia FritschDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37070, Göttingen, Germany.
Ginette Ploeger
Donna J Arndt-Jovin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopy has been a very powerful tool for Drosophila research since its inception, proving to be essential for the evaluation of mutant phenotypes, the understanding of cellular and tissue physiology, and the illumination of complex biological questions. In this article we review the breadth of this field, making note of some of the seminal papers. We expand on the use of microscopy to study questions related to gene locus and nuclear architecture, presenting new data using fluorescence in-situ hybridization techniques that demonstrate the flexibility of Drosophila chromosomes. Finally, we review the burgeoning use of fluorescence in-vivo imaging methods to yield quantitative information about cellular processes.

Indexed as

In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicroscopyAnimalsChromatinChromosomesDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaEmbryo, NonmammalianGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent AgentsMicroscopy, FluorescencePhysical Chromosome MappingChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.