Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16820481›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2006

Estimation of Staphylococcus aureus growth parameters from turbidity data: characterization of strain variation and comparison of methods.

R Lindqvist

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biotemplated Photocatalytic Micromotors for Effective Inhibition of Bacterial Growth.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  3. A retrospective review of outcomes in open tibial fractures following the implementation of BAPRAS/BOA guidelines.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Critical Factors Affecting the Prevalence ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proteomic Comparison of Ivermectin Sensitive and ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison on the Growth Variability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Early treatment gains for antibiotic administration and within human host time series data.Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effect of Curcumin Against Proteus mirabilis During Crystallization of Struvite from Artificial Urine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R LindqvistMicrobiology Division, Department of Research and Development, National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden. roland.lindqvist@slv.se

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Turbidity methods offer possibilities for generating data required for addressing microorganism variability in risk modeling given that the results of these methods correspond to those of viable count methods. The objectives of this study were to identify the best approach for determining growth parameters based on turbidity data and use of a Bioscreen instrument and to characterize variability in growth parameters of 34 Staphylococcus aureus strains of different biotypes isolated from broiler carcasses. Growth parameters were estimated by fitting primary growth models to turbidity growth curves or to detection times of serially diluted cultures either directly or by using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) approach. The maximum specific growth rates in chicken broth at 17 degrees C estimated by time to detection methods were in good agreement with viable count estimates, whereas growth models (exponential and Richards) underestimated growth rates. Time to detection methods were selected for strain characterization. The variation of growth parameters among strains was best described by either the logistic or lognormal distribution, but definitive conclusions require a larger data set. The distribution of the physiological state parameter ranged from 0.01 to 0.92 and was not significantly different from a normal distribution. Strain variability was important, and the coefficient of variation of growth parameters was up to six times larger among strains than within strains. It is suggested to apply a time to detection (ANOVA) approach using turbidity measurements for convenient and accurate estimation of growth parameters. The results emphasize the need to consider implications of strain variability for predictive modeling and risk assessment.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriological TechniquesChickensColony Count, MicrobialCulture MediaNephelometry and TurbidimetryStaphylococcus aureusCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID16820481
PMCPMC1489309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.