Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16820054›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2006

A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation.

Mark Strong, Ravi Maheswaran, Tim Pearson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Does the Morbidity of Sore Throat in Recurrent Tonsillitis Correlate With the Tonsillitis Outcome Inventory-14 (TOI-14)?Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Socioeconomic deprivation and accident and emergency attendances: cross-sectional analysis of general practices in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Do general practices provide equitable access to physical activity interventions?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A method for modelling GP practice level deprivation scores using GIS.International journal of health geographics · 2007
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark StrongRotherham Primary Care Trust, Oak House, Moorhead Way, Bramley, Rotherham, S66 1YY, UK. m.strong@sheffield.ac.uk
Ravi Maheswaran
Tim Pearson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA measure of the socioeconomic deprivation experienced by the registered patient population of a general practice is of interest because it can be used to explore the association between deprivation and a wide range of other variables measured at practice level. If patient level geographical data are available a population weighted mean area-based deprivation score can be calculated for each practice. In the absence of these data, an area-based deprivation score linked to the practice postcode can be used as an estimate of the socioeconomic deprivation of the practice population. This study explores the correlation between Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 (IMD) scores linked to general practice postcodes (main surgery address alone and main surgery plus any branch surgeries), practice population weighted mean IMD scores, and practice level mortality (aged 1 to 75 years, all causes) for 38 practices in Rotherham UK.

resultsPopulation weighted deprivation scores correlated with practice postcode based scores (main surgery only, Pearson r = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.85; main plus branch surgeries, r = 0.79, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.89). All cause mortality aged 1 to 75 correlated with deprivation (main surgery postcode based measure, r = 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.71; main plus branch surgery based score, r = 0.55, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.74); population weighted measure, r = 0.66, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.81).

conclusionPractice postcode linked IMD scores provide a valid proxy for a population weighted measure in the absence of patient level data. However, by using them, the strength of association between mortality and deprivation may be underestimated.

Indexed as

PovertyPoverty AreasCause of DeathFamily PracticeHealth Status IndicatorsHumansSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID16820054
PMCPMC1524946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.