ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1991
Inhibition by cations of antagonist binding to histamine H1-receptors: differential effect of sodium ions on the binding of two radioligands.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulation of GPCRs by monovalent cations and anions.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2015Review
- Modulation of antagonist binding to histamine H1-receptors by sodium ions and by 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propan-1,3-diol HCl.British journal of pharmacology · 1994Article
- Calcium-dependence of histamine- and carbachol-induced inositol phosphate formation in human U373 MG astrocytoma cells: comparison with HeLa cells and brain slices.British journal of pharmacology · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
1. Measurements have been made of the inhibition by mono- and divalent cations of the binding of [3H]-(+)-N-methyl-4-methyldiphenhydramine ([3H]-QMDP) to histamine H1-receptors in homogenates of guinea-pig cerebellum. 2. The binding of [3H]-QMDP was inhibited by monovalent cations with an order of potency Li+ = Na+ greater than K+ greater than Cs+ = Rb+. The IC50 for Li+ was 39 mM, but that for K+ was 132 mM. Hill coefficients for inhibition curves for Li+ and Na+ were less than 1. 3. Divalent cations also inhibited the binding of [3H]-QMDP. The most potent cations examined were Hg2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+, with IC50 values of 5, 17 and 41 microM, respectively. Ca2+ and Mg2+ were relatively weak inhibitors (IC50 12 and 34 mM, respectively). The potency of Ni2+, Co2+ and Mn2+ was intermediate between these groups. Hill coefficients for inhibition curves for Hg2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+ were greater than 1, but Hill coefficients for the other cations were less than 1. 4. Both mono- and divalent cations also inhibited the binding of [3H]-mepyramine. The divalent cations were approximately equipotent in inhibiting the binding of [3H]-QMDP and [3H]-mepyramine. The same was true for Li+. However, Na+ was markedly more effective against [3H]-QMDP binding than against the binding of [3H]-mepyramine. 5. The effect of 40 mM Li+ on the parameters of binding of [3H]-mepyramine was to increase the best-fit value of the concentration giving half-maximal binding EC50, by approximately 2 fold without having any significant effect on the maximum amount of binding. Cd2+ (15 microM) caused both an increase in EC 0 and a decrease in Bmax (32 +/- 4% inhibition). Na+, 100 mm, had no significant effect on either EC50 or Bmax for [3H]-mepyramine binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.