Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16819594›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2006

Analysis of referrals to a multi-disciplinary breast cancer genetics clinic: practical and economic considerations.

Marta M Reis, Dorothy Young, Lorna McLeish, David Goudie, Alan Cook, Frank Sullivan, Helen Vysny, Alison Fordyce, Roger Black, Manouche Tavakoli and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Why do women not return family history forms when referred to breast cancer genetics services? A mixed-method study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marta M ReisTayside Breast Cancer Family Clinic, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Dorothy Young
Lorna McLeish
David Goudie
Alan Cook
Frank Sullivan
Helen Vysny
Alison Fordyce
Roger Black
Manouche Tavakoli
Michael Steel
Ninewells Hospital · GBNational Health Service Scotland · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of activity was undertaken in an established regional clinic providing risk assessment, counselling, screening and management for women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. The objectives were to determine: (1) how closely the route and pattern of referrals matched official guidelines (2) whether the previously recorded socio-economic imbalance among clinic clientele persisted and (3) the economic and practical consequences of committing resources to verification and extension of reported family histories. The findings were: (1) after some years of operation, the proportion of referrals direct from primary care had increased from less than 50% to over 75%, with a concomitant slight decrease in overall referral rate; (2) the socio-economic distribution of patients referred had become less selective and (3) extension and verification of reported family histories led to a redistribution of risk categories, increasing the proportion of referrals judged to be in the "low risk" category, from 25% (based on referral letter alone) to 41% (at the end of the process). The costs associated with this approach are offset by the savings generated and it allows specialised counselling and screening services to be targeted more efficiently.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsReferral and ConsultationBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID16819594
OpenAlexW2138755162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.