ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006
Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole-Genome Alignment and Comparative Annotation.Annual review of animal biosciences · 2019Review
- IPred - integrating ab initio and evidence based gene predictions to improve prediction accuracy.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Microbiota conservation and BMI signatures in adult monozygotic twins.The ISME journal · 2013Article
- ASPic-GeneID: a lightweight pipeline for gene prediction and alternative isoforms detection.BioMed research international · 2013Article
- Article
- Cross-species protein sequence and gene structure prediction with fine-tuned Webscipio 2.0 and Scipio.BMC research notes · 2011Article
- The genome sequence of the North-European cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) unravels evolutionary adaptation mechanisms in plants.PloS one · 2011Article
- The completion of the Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC).Genome research · 2009Article
- More than 9,000,000 unique genes in human gut bacterial community: estimating gene numbers inside a human body.PloS one · 2009Article
- EasyCluster: a fast and efficient gene-oriented clustering tool for large-scale transcriptome data.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments.Genome biology · 2008Article
- Conrad: gene prediction using conditional random fields.Genome research · 2007Article
- Genomix: a method for combining gene-finders' predictions, which uses evolutionary conservation of sequence and intron-exon structure.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2007Article
- Exploring nervous system transcriptomes during embryogenesis and metamorphosis in Xenopus tropicalis using EST analysis.BMC genomics · 2007Article
- Comprehensive annotation of bidirectional promoters identifies co-regulation among breast and ovarian cancer genes.PLoS computational biology · 2007Article
- Characterising alternate splicing and tissue specific expression in the chicken from ESTs.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2007Article
- CONTRAST: a discriminative, phylogeny-free approach to multiple informant de novo gene prediction.Genome biology · 2007Article
- Pairagon+N-SCAN_EST: a model-based gene annotation pipeline.Genome biology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundESTs are a tremendous resource for determining the exon-intron structures of genes, but even extensive EST sequencing tends to leave many exons and genes untouched. Gene prediction systems based exclusively on EST alignments miss these exons and genes, leading to poor sensitivity. De novo gene prediction systems, which ignore ESTs in favor of genomic sequence, can predict such "untouched" exons, but they are less accurate when predicting exons to which ESTs align. TWINSCAN is the most accurate de novo gene finder available for nematodes and N-SCAN is the most accurate for mammals, as measured by exact CDS gene prediction and exact exon prediction.
resultsTWINSCAN_EST is a new system that successfully combines EST alignments with TWINSCAN. On the whole C. elegans genome TWINSCAN_EST shows 14% improvement in sensitivity and 13% in specificity in predicting exact gene structures compared to TWINSCAN without EST alignments. Not only are the structures revealed by EST alignments predicted correctly, but these also constrain the predictions without alignments, improving their accuracy. For the human genome, we used the same approach with N-SCAN, creating N-SCAN_EST. On the whole genome, N-SCAN_EST produced a 6% improvement in sensitivity and 1% in specificity of exact gene structure predictions compared to N-SCAN.
conclusionTWINSCAN_EST and N-SCAN_EST are more accurate than TWINSCAN and N-SCAN, while retaining their ability to discover novel genes to which no ESTs align. Thus, we recommend using the EST versions of these programs to annotate any genome for which EST information is available.TWINSCAN_EST and N-SCAN_EST are part of the TWINSCAN open source software package http://genes.cse.wustl.edu/distribution/download_TS.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.