Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16817317›Full record

ReviewCell stress & chaperones2006

On the brotherhood of the mitochondrial chaperones mortalin and heat shock protein 60.

Custer C Deocaris, Sunil C Kaul, Renu Wadhwa

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell stress & chaperones, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mitochondrial chaperones in human health and disease.Free radical biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Rapidly GrowingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Role of Heat Shock Proteins (HSP70 and HSP90) in Viral Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Custer C DeocarisNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Central 4, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba Science City 305-8562, Japan.
Sunil C Kaul
Renu Wadhwa
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heat shock chaperones mortalin/mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 (mtHsp70) and Hsp60 are found in multiple subcellular sites and function in the folding and intracellular trafficking of many proteins. The chaperoning activity of these 2 proteins involves different structural and functional mechanisms. In spite of providing an excellent model for an evolutionarily conserved molecular "brotherhood", their individual functions, although overlapping, are nonredundant. As they travel to various locations, both chaperones acquire different binding partners and exert a more divergent involvement in tumorigenesis, cellular senescence, and immunology. An understanding of their functional biology may lead to novel designing and development of therapeutic strategies for cancer and aging.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisChaperonin 60Heat-Shock ResponseHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansMitochondrial ProteinsModels, BiologicalMolecular ChaperonesNeoplasmsChaperonin 60HSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsMolecular Chaperonesmortalin

Identifiers

PMID16817317
PMCPMC1484513
OpenAlexW2180488799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.