Preconception care and women with or at risk for diabetes: implications for community intervention.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Influence of red blood cell indices on HbA1c performance in detecting dysglycaemia in a Singapore preconception cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021
   Trial
2. Reproductive care in Thai women with diabetes mellitus: a descriptive cross-sectional study.Reproductive health · 2023
   Article
3. Development and validation of a clinical model for preconception and early pregnancy risk prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in nulliparous women.PloS one · 2019
   Article
4. The Dutch national summit on preconception care: a summary of definitions, evidence and recommendations.Journal of community genetics · 2015
   Article
5. The challenges and future considerations regarding pregnancy-related outcomes in women with pre-existing diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2013
   Review
6. Pre-pregnancy predictors of diabetes in pregnancy among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in North Queensland, Australia.Maternal and child health journal · 2012
   Article
7. Integrating preconception care for women with diabetes into primary care: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
   Article
8. Preconception planning: are we making progress?Current diabetes reports · 2008
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as