Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16807806›Full record

ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2005

Myoepithelial cells: pathology, cell separation and markers of myoepithelial differentiation.

Catherine Clarke, Jennifer Sandle, Sunil R Lakhani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cell-matrix interactions in mammary gland development and breast cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2010
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Role of myoepithelial cells in breast tumor progression.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2010
    Review
  10. Article
  11. [Anatomy of the breast].Der Pathologe · 2009
    Review
  12. A novel myoepithelial/progenitor cell marker in the breast?Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine ClarkeMolecular & Cellular Pathology, Mayne Medical School, Queensland Institute of Medical Research & The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jennifer Sandle
Sunil R Lakhani
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently the myoepithelial cell has been studied relatively little in terms of its role in breast cancer. A number of malignancies showing myoepithelial differentiation have been reported in the literature, although they are still thought to be relatively rare and only limited studies are published. As a result of recent expression profiling experiments, one type of tumor with myoepithelial features, the so-called 'basal' breast cancer, has received a renewed interest, although it has been known to pathologists for more than two decades. These tumors, which express markers of both luminal and myoepithelial cells, are now being studied using antibodies against some new molecules that have emerged from studies of sorted normal luminal and myoepithelial cells. These immunohistochemical data, combined with genomic studies, may lead to better identification and management of patients with 'basal' tumors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersBreastBreast NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell SeparationCell Transformation, NeoplasticEpithelial CellsHumansImmunophenotypingKeratinsMyoepitheliomaNeoplasms, Basal CellStem CellsBiomarkersKeratins

Identifiers

PMID16807806
OpenAlexW2075740981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.