Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16807801›Full record

ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2005

Myoepithelial cells in the control of mammary development and tumorigenesis: data from genetically modified mice.

Marisa M Faraldo, Jérôme Teulière, Marie-Ange Deugnier, Ilaria Taddei-De La Hosseraye, Jean Paul Thiery, Marina A Glukhova

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cellular foundations of mammary tubulogenesis.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marisa M FaraldoInstitut Curie, CNRS UMR144, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248, Paris Cedex 05, France.
Jérôme Teulière
Marie-Ange Deugnier
Ilaria Taddei-De La Hosseraye
Jean Paul Thiery
Marina A Glukhova
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, myoepithelial cells-the second major cell population in the mammary epithelium-were not considered to play an important role in the morphogenetic events during gland development. Mouse mutants with changes in the gene expression pattern characteristic of the basal myoepithelial cell layer have been generated and used to show that these cells influence the proliferation, survival and differentiation of luminal cells, modulate stromal-epithelial interactions and actively participate in mammary morphogenesis. Various cellular and molecular mechanisms may underlie the observed phenotypes. These include an unbalanced expression of matrix degrading metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors, leading to changes in the composition and organization of the (extracellular matrix) ECM, the production of soluble growth factors affecting stromal and epithelial cell growth and differentiation and direct signaling through cell-cell contacts between the myoepithelial and luminal cell layers.

Indexed as

AnimalsEpithelial CellsEpitheliumFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMammary Glands, AnimalMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMice, TransgenicMorphogenesisMuscle CellsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID16807801
OpenAlexW2009454023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.