Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16807295›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Structure-function-folding relationship in a WW domain.

Marcus Jäger, Yan Zhang, Jan Bieschke, Houbi Nguyen, Maria Dendle, Marianne E Bowman, Joseph P Noel, Martin Gruebele, Jeffery W Kelly

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 220 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Backbone double-mutant cycle analysis quantifies hydrogen-bond energies in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Design and evolution of a synthetic small protein scaffold based on the WW domain.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Structural and energetic analysis of stabilizing indel mutations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Uncertainties in Markov State Models of Small Proteins.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Activity and Affinity of Pin1 Variants.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus JägerDepartment of Chemistry and The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, BCC265, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Yan Zhang
Jan Bieschke
Houbi Nguyen
Maria Dendle
Marianne E Bowman
Joseph P Noel
Martin Gruebele
Jeffery W Kelly
Scripps Research Institute · USInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics · RUSalk Institute for Biological Studies · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF T-CELL RECEPTOR ALPHA GENEP01CA054418 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI VERMA, INDER MOHAN · 1991 to 2005
$14.1M
UNDERSTANDING B-SHEET STRUCTURE IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONR01GM051105 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI KELLY, JEFFERY W · 1994 to 2019
$5.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS CA 054418NCI NIH HHS P01 CA054418NIGMS NIH HHS GM 051105NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein folding barriers result from a combination of factors including unavoidable energetic frustration from nonnative interactions, natural variation and selection of the amino acid sequence for function, and/or selection pressure against aggregation. The rate-limiting step for human Pin1 WW domain folding is the formation of the loop 1 substructure. The native conformation of this six-residue loop positions side chains that are important for mediating protein-protein interactions through the binding of Pro-rich sequences. Replacement of the wild-type loop 1 primary structure by shorter sequences with a high propensity to fold into a type-I' beta-turn conformation or the statistically preferred type-I G1 bulge conformation accelerates WW domain folding by almost an order of magnitude and increases thermodynamic stability. However, loop engineering to optimize folding energetics has a significant downside: it effectively eliminates WW domain function according to ligand-binding studies. The energetic contribution of loop 1 to ligand binding appears to have evolved at the expense of fast folding and additional protein stability. Thus, the two-state barrier exhibited by the wild-type human Pin1 WW domain principally results from functional requirements, rather than from physical constraints inherent to even the most efficient loop formation process.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAmino Acid SequenceCrystallography, X-RayEnzyme StabilityHumansKineticsLigandsMolecular Sequence DataNIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl IsomerasePeptidylprolyl IsomeraseProtein Structure, TertiaryStructure-Activity RelationshipThermodynamicsLigandsNIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl IsomerasePeptidylprolyl IsomerasePIN1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID16807295
PMCPMC1502286
OpenAlexW2098354564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.