Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16807294›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

The dominant role of CD8+ dendritic cells in cross-presentation is not dictated by antigen capture.

Petra Schnorrer, Georg M N Behrens, Nicholas S Wilson, Joanne L Pooley, Christopher M Smith, Dima El-Sukkari, Gayle Davey, Fiona Kupresanin, Ming Li, Eugene Maraskovsky and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 374 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The evolving biology of cross-presentation.Seminars in immunology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Petra SchnorrerImmunology Division and Cooperative Research Centre for Vaccine Technology, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia.
Georg M N Behrens
Nicholas S Wilson
Joanne L Pooley
Christopher M Smith
Dima El-Sukkari
Gayle Davey
Fiona Kupresanin
Ming Li
Eugene Maraskovsky
Gabrielle T Belz
Francis R Carbone
Ken Shortman
William R Heath
Jose A Villadangos
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AUCSL (Australia) · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse spleens contain three populations of conventional (CD11c(high)) dendritic cells (DCs) that play distinct functions. The CD8(+) DC are unique in that they can present exogenous antigens on their MHC class I molecules, a process known as cross-presentation. It is unclear whether this special ability is because only the CD8(+) DC can capture the antigens used in cross-presentation assays, or because this is the only DC population that possesses specialized machinery for cross-presentation. To solve this important question we examined the splenic DC subsets for their ability to both present via MHC class II molecules and cross-present via MHC class I using four different forms of the model antigen ovalbumin (OVA). These forms include a cell-associated form, a soluble form, OVA expressed in bacteria, or OVA bound to latex beads. With the exception of bacterial antigen, which was poorly cross-presented by all DC, all antigenic forms were cross-presented much more efficiently by the CD8(+) DC. This pattern could not be attributed simply to a difference in antigen capture because all DC subsets presented the antigen via MHC class II. Indeed, direct assessments of endocytosis showed that CD8(+) and CD8(-) DC captured comparable amounts of soluble and bead-associated antigen, yet only the CD8(+) DC cross-presented these antigenic forms. Our results indicate that cross-presentation requires specialized machinery that is expressed by CD8(+) DC but largely absent from CD8(-) DC. This conclusion has important implications for the design of vaccination strategies based on antigen targeting to DC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigensAntigens, BacterialCD8 AntigensCells, CulturedCross-PrimingDendritic CellsLatexMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMice, Mutant StrainsMice, TransgenicMicrospheresOvalbuminSpleenAntigensAntigens, BacterialCD8 AntigensLatexOvalbumin

Identifiers

PMID16807294
PMCPMC1502299
OpenAlexW2021943943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.