Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16806508›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2006

Inducible proteopathies.

Lary C Walker, Harry Levine, Mark P Mattson, Mathias Jucker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Prion-like mechanisms in Alzheimer disease.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018
    Review
  14. Molecular pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  15. Mapping Neurodegenerative Disease Onset and Progression.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lary C WalkerYerkes National Primate Research Center and Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. lary.walker@emory.edu
Harry Levine
Mark P Mattson
Mathias Jucker

Funding

YNPRC NHP CLINICAL MEDICINE RESIDENCY PROGRAM - SUPPLEMENTP51RR000165 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, JOHN DAVID · 1985 to 2011
$114.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000165NCRR NIH HHS RR 00165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous degenerative diseases are characterized by the aberrant polymerization and accumulation of specific proteins. These proteopathies include neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease and the prion diseases, in addition to diverse systemic disorders, particularly the amyloidoses. The prion diseases have been shown to be transmissible by an alternative conformation of the normal cellular prion protein. Other proteopathies have been thought to be non-transmissible, but there is growing evidence that some systemic and cerebral amyloidoses can be induced by exposure of susceptible hosts to cognate molecular templates. As we review here, the mechanistic similarities among these diseases provide unprecedented opportunities for elucidating the induction of protein misfolding and assembly in vivo, and for developing an integrated therapeutic approach to degenerative proteopathies.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloidosisAnimalsApolipoproteinsHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesPrionsProtein FoldingAmyloid beta-PeptidesApolipoproteinsPrions

Identifiers

PMID16806508
PMCPMC10725716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.