Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16803741›Full record

ReviewHome health care services quarterly2006

Depression care for the elderly: reducing barriers to evidence-based practice.

Kathleen Ell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Home health care services quarterly, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Harnessing Peer Support in an Online Intervention for Older Adults with Depression.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2017
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathleen EllSchool of Social Work, University of Southern Califonia, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0411, USA. ell@usc.edu
University of Southern California · US

Funding

MULTIFACETED HOME CARE DEPRESSION PROGRAMR24MH061700 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ELL, KATHLEEN R · 2000 to 2003
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS 5R24 MH61700-02NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH061700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of five key bodies of evidence identifying: (1) Characteristics of depression among older adults -- its prevalence, risk factors and illness course, and impact on functional status, mortality, use of health services, and health care costs; (2) Effective Interventions, including pharmacologic, psychotherapies, care management, and combined intervention models; (3) Known Barriers to depression care including patient, provider and service system barriers; (4) Effective Organizational and Educational Strategies to reduce barriers to depression care; and (5) Key Factors in Translating Research into Practice. There is strong empirical support for implementing strategies to improve depression care for older adults.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHealth Services AccessibilityAgedDepressionHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID16803741
PMCPMC1501087
OpenAlexW2016570204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.