ReviewCardiovascular ultrasound2006
Factors affecting left ventricular remodeling after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. An overview.
Review in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early and late outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement with or without aortic annular enlargement in patients with small aortic annulus: an exploratory comparison of Y-incision versus Manouguian techniques.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Patient-prosthesis mismatch after aortic valve replacement: Effects on left ventricular structure.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of small size sutureless prostheses: results for 241 patients from an international registry.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Functional Mitral Regurgitation Post-Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Pressure Overload Activates DNA-Damage Response in Cardiac Stromal Cells: A Novel Mechanism Behind Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Comparison of safety and haemodynamic performance between the Avalus™ stented aortic valve bioprosthesis and Magna™ valve in Japanese patients.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021Article
- Pattern Analysis of Left Ventricular Remodeling Using Cardiac Computed Tomography in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Preliminary Results.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Regression of left ventricular mass after implantation of the sutureless 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2015Article
- Gender difference in ventricular response to aortic stenosis: insight from cardiovascular magnetic resonance.PloS one · 2015Article
- Left ventricular mass regression after sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis: preliminary results.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although a small percentage of patients with critical aortic stenosis do not develop left ventricle hypertrophy, increased ventricular mass is widely observed in conditions of increased afterload. There is growing epidemiological evidence that hypertrophy is associated with excess cardiac mortality and morbidity not only in patients with arterial hypertension, but also in those undergoing aortic valve replacement. Valve replacement surgery relieves the aortic obstruction and prolongs the life of many patients, but favorable or adverse left ventricular remodeling is affected by a large number of factors whose specific roles are still a subject of debate. Age, gender, hemodynamic factors, prosthetic valve types, myocyte alterations, interstitial structures, blood pressure control and ethnicity can all influence the process of left ventricle mass regression, and myocardial metabolism and coronary artery circulation are also involved in the changes occurring after aortic valve replacement. The aim of this overview is to analyze these factors in the light of our experience, elucidate the important question of prosthesis-patient mismatch by considering the method of effective orifice area, and discuss surgical timings and techniques that can improve the management of patients with aortic valve stenosis and maximize the probability of mass regression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.