ArticleMolecular diversity2006
Prediction of genotoxicity of various environmental pollutants by artificial neural network simulation.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to evaluate human carcinogenic risks, genotoxicity data such as animal cancer bioassay are often not available. In this study, to assess the relevance of indicator of carcinogenic risks, we used the "molecular diversity approach" to estimate the genotoxicity based upon Salmonella genotoxicity test using the umu test and systemic toxicity data of the 82 environmental chemicals predicted by neural network simulation. The 82 environmental chemicals were randomly selected for this study according to the production and usage in Japan. Even in this challenging trial for QSTR (Quantitative Structure Toxicity Relationship) study, approaches using artificial neural networks can account for about 94% of the variation in the genotoxicity results derived by the umu-test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.