Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16801415›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2006

Impact of antimicrobial dosing regimen on evolution of drug resistance in vivo: fluconazole and Candida albicans.

D Andes, A Forrest, A Lepak, J Nett, K Marchillo, L Lincoln

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antifungal pharmacodynamics: Latin America's perspective.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microevolution of the pathogenic yeastsMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D AndesDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53792, USA. dra@medicine.wisc.edu
A Forrest
A Lepak
J Nett
K Marchillo
L Lincoln
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN HEMATOLOGYT32HL007899 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Jane Ellen Churpek · 1998 to 2026
$8.2M
Pharmacodynamics in Antifungal ResistanceK08AI001767 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI ANDES, DAVID R · 2001 to 2005
$627k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007899NIAID NIH HHS AI01767-01A1NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI001767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous factors have been theorized to affect the development of antimicrobial resistance, including those specific to the host, the organism, the environment, the drug, and the drug prescriber. One variable under the control of the prescriber is the drug dosing regimen. Dosing regimens can vary in dose level, dosing interval, and treatment duration. The current studies examined the relationships between antimicrobial dosing regimens and resistance development by use of an in vivo model. A murine model of systemic Candida albicans infection was used to examine resistance emergence during exposure to the triazole antifungal fluconazole. Data from this experimental model demonstrated that the more frequently administered dosing prevented selection of the isogenic resistant cell populations. Conversely, dosing regimens producing prolonged sub-MIC effects appeared to contribute to the outgrowth of isogenic resistant strains. The association between dosing and resistance emergence observed in the current investigation is disparate from that described for antimicrobial compounds with cidal killing characteristics. The inhibitory or static antimicrobial activity of the triazole compounds may explain these differences.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveCandida albicansCandidiasisDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleFluconazoleHumansMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, BiologicalSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID16801415
PMCPMC1489796
OpenAlexW2130699530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.