ArticleThe Biochemical journal2006
In vivo binding of NF-kappaB to the IkappaBbeta promoter is insufficient for transcriptional activation.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endogenous Network Modeling Reveals Mechanisms of Repair Schwann Cell Decline and Potential Recovery Targets.Biology · 2026Article
- Nuclear Transit and HIV LTR Binding of NF-κB Subunits Held by IκB Proteins: Implications for HIV-1 Activation.Viruses · 2019Article
- Article
- The Crosstalk of Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress Pathways with NF-κB: Complex Mechanisms Relevant for Cancer, Inflammation and Infection.Biomedicines · 2018Review
- Targeting IκB proteins for HIV latency activation: the role of individual IκB and NF-κB proteins.Journal of virology · 2013Article
- A quantitative study of the cell-type specific modulation of c-Rel by hydrogen peroxide and TNF-α.Redox biology · 2013Article
- Regulation of chondrocytic gene expression by biomechanical signals.Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression · 2008Review
- Biomechanical signals inhibit IKK activity to attenuate NF-kappaB transcription activity in inflamed chondrocytes.Arthritis and rheumatism · 2007Article
- Identification ofCancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite certain structural and biochemical similarities, differences exist in the function of the NF-kappaB (nuclear factor kappaB) inhibitory proteins IkappaBalpha (inhibitory kappaBalpha) and IkappaBbeta. The functional disparity arises in part from variance at the level of gene regulation, and in particular from the substantial induction of IkappaBalpha, but not IkappaBbeta, gene expression post-NF-kappaB activation. In the present study, we probe the differential effects of IL (interleukin)-1beta on induction of IkappaBalpha and perform the first characterization of the human IkappaBbeta promoter. A consensus NF-kappaB-binding site, capable of binding NF-kappaB both in vitro and in vivo, is found in the IkappaBbeta gene 5' flanking region. However, the IkappaBbeta promoter was not substantially activated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1beta and tumour necrosis factor alpha, that are known to cause strong activation of NF-kappaB. Furthermore, in contrast with IkappaBalpha, NF-kappaB activation did not increase expression of endogenous IkappaBbeta as assessed by analysis of mRNA and protein levels. Unlike kappaB-responsive promoters, IkappaBbeta promoter-bound p65 inefficiently recruits RNA polymerase II, which stalls at the promoter. We present evidence that this stalling is likely due to the absence of transcription factor IIH engagement, a prerequisite for RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and transcriptional initiation. Differences in the conformation of promoter-bound NF-kappaB may underlie the variation in the ability to engage the basal transcriptional apparatus at the IkappaBbeta and kappaB-responsive promoters. This accounts for the differential expression of IkappaB family members in response to NF-kappaB activation and furthers our understanding of the mechanisms involved in transcription factor activity and IkappaBbeta gene regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.