Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16791547›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2007

[Antidepressants and suicidality. Risk-benefit analysis].

U Hegerl

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

U HegerlAbteilung für Klinische Neurophysiologie, Psychiatrische Klinik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336 München. ulrich.hegerl@psy.med.uni-muenchen.de
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reanalyses of placebo-controlled trials reveal an increased risk of suicidal ideations or parasuicidal acts in children and adolescents under treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or other antidepressants. Although no completed suicide was shown, these findings are the more important because, with the exception of fluoxetine, an evidence base for the efficacy of antidepressants is weak or lacking in this age group. For adults, there is no reason to doubt that antidepressants help to reduce suicides by shortening depressive episodes and preventing recurrence. A general and pronounced suicide-inducing effect of SSRI or other antidepressants can largely be excluded. On the other hand, in some vulnerable patients the risk of suicidal acts can increase, especially during the first days of antidepressant treatment. There is no evidence that this risk is higher with SSRI than with other antidepressants or nonpharmacological treatments. Safety in case of overdose is a strong argument favouring newer antidepressants over tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants in outpatients with unclear suicidality. The current widespread public discussions concering the risks of antidepressants is a risk in itself because confidence in treatment, compliance, and help seeking behaviour may get influenced negatively.

Indexed as

Suicide PreventionAntidepressive AgentsHumansIncidenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSuicideAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID16791547
OpenAlexW1514531244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.