Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16790841›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2006

Prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins from amino acid sequence.

Michael Terribilini, Jae-Hyung Lee, Changhui Yan, Robert L Jernigan, Vasant Honavar, Drena Dobbs

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Amino Acid Composition in Various Types of Nucleic Acid-Binding Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Mapping of Functional Subdomains in theFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sequence-Based Prediction of RNA-Binding Residues in Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  18. A Graph Approach to Mining Biological Patterns in the Binding Interfaces.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael TerribiliniBioinformatics and Computationa Biology, Graduate Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA. terrible@iastate.edu
Jae-Hyung Lee
Changhui Yan
Robert L Jernigan
Vasant Honavar
Drena Dobbs
Iowa State University · USUtah State University · US

Funding

Discovery of Protein Seq.Struct.Func.RelationshipsR33GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2005 to 2006
$545k
Protein Sequence Structure Function RelationshipsR21GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2003 to 2004
$291k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM066387NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM066387NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM066387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-protein interactions are vitally important in a wide range of biological processes, including regulation of gene expression, protein synthesis, and replication and assembly of many viruses. We have developed a computational tool for predicting which amino acids of an RNA binding protein participate in RNA-protein interactions, using only the protein sequence as input. RNABindR was developed using machine learning on a validated nonredundant data set of interfaces from known RNA-protein complexes in the Protein Data Bank. It generates a classifier that captures primary sequence signals sufficient for predicting which amino acids in a given protein are located in the RNA-protein interface. In leave-one-out cross-validation experiments, RNABindR identifies interface residues with >85% overall accuracy. It can be calibrated by the user to obtain either high specificity or high sensitivity for interface residues. RNABindR, implementing a Naive Bayes classifier, performs as well as a more complex neural network classifier (to our knowledge, the only previously published sequence-based method for RNA binding site prediction) and offers the advantages of speed, simplicity and interpretability of results. RNABindR predictions on the human telomerase protein hTERT are in good agreement with experimental data. The availability of computational tools for predicting which residues in an RNA binding protein are likely to contact RNA should facilitate design of experiments to directly test RNA binding function and contribute to our understanding of the diversity, mechanisms, and regulation of RNA-protein complexes in biological systems. (RNABindR is available as a Web tool from http://bindr.gdcb.iastate.edu.).

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPredictive Value of TestsProtein ConformationProteinsReproducibility of ResultsAmino AcidsProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID16790841
PMCPMC1524891
OpenAlexW2168272116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.