Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16790728›Full record

ReviewArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2006

How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?

O C Onuzo

Abstract readCommentReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Complex Regulation of Mitochondrial Function During Cardiac Development.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Functions of miRNAs during Mammalian Heart Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Cell autonomous requirement of endocardial Smad4 during atrioventricular cushion development in mouse embryos.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

O C OnuzoUniversity Hospital of Wales, Paediatric Cardiology, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales, UK. obed.onuzo@cardiffandvale.wales.nhs.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningPediatric NursingPhysical ExaminationSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID16790728
PMCPMC2672721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.