ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2007
How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients.
Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07163767 (Acute Myocardial Infarction Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence Applied to Electrocardiogram Images), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence Applied to Electrocardiogram Images
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Pooled it
- Evaluating the quality of research into a single prognostic biomarker: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 83 studies of C-reactive protein in stable coronary artery disease.PLoS medicine · 2010Pooled it
- Mindfulness-based intervention in patients with persistent pain in chest (MIPIC) of non-cardiac cause: a feasibility randomised control study.Open heart · 2022Trial
- Guiding Therapy by Coronary CT Angiography Improves Outcomes in Patients With Stable Chest Pain.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019Trial
- Cognitive behaviour therapy for non-cardiac pain in the chest (COPIC): a multicentre randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation.BMC psychology · 2015Trial
- An intervention to reassure patients about test results in rapid access chest pain clinic: a pilot randomised controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2014Trial
- Trial
- Information sheets for patients with acute chest pain: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009Trial
- The prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients presenting with 'non-anginal chest pain'.The British journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Non-cardiac Chest Pain in Japan: Prevalence, Impact, and Consultation Behavior - A Population-based Study.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023Article
- Determining cardiovascular risk in patients with unattributed chest pain in UK primary care: an electronic health record study.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2023Article
- Great Debate: Computed tomography coronary angiography should be the initial diagnostic test in suspected angina.European heart journal · 2023Article
- NICE guidelines in the Sunderland RACPC cohort study: one size does not fit all.The British journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of Retinal Vasculature Nomogram in Suspected Angina Due to Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2022Article
- Article
- Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk and Management of Patients Recorded in Primary Care With Unattributed Chest Pain: An Electronic Health Record Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Improving Awareness Could Transform Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 1].Global spine journal · 2022Article
- Utilization of diagnostic resources and costs in patients with suspected cardiac chest pain.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2021Article
- Incremental value of QT interval for the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Cardiac Noninvasive Diagnostic Testing for Outpatient Chest Pain: Rethinking "Less Is More".Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether rapid access chest pain clinics are clinically effective by comparison of coronary event rates in patients diagnosed with angina with rates in patients diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain and the general population.
designMulticentre cohort study of consecutive patients with chest pain attending the rapid access chest pain clinics (RACPCs) of six hospitals in England.
participants8762 patients diagnosed with either non-cardiac chest pain (n = 6396) or incident angina without prior myocardial infarction (n = 2366) at first cardiological assessment, followed up for a median of 2.57 (interquartile range 1.96-4.15) years.
main outcome measuresPrimary end point--death due to coronary heart disease (International Classification of Diseases (ICD)10 I20-I25) or acute coronary syndrome (non-fatal myocardial infarction (ICD10 I21-I23), hospital admission with unstable angina (I24.0, I24.8, I24.9)). Secondary end points--all-cause mortality (ICD I20), cardiovascular death (ICD10 I00-I99), or non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (I60-I69).
resultsThe cumulative probability of the primary end point in patients diagnosed with angina was 16.52% (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.88% to 18.32%) after 3 years compared with 2.73% (95% CI 2.29% to 3.25%) in patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Coronary standardised mortality ratios for men and women with angina aged <65 years were 3.52 (95% CI 1.98 to 5.07) and 4.39 (95% CI 1.14 to 7.64). Of the 599 patients who had the primary end point, 194 (32.4%) had been diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain. These patients were younger, less likely to have typical symptoms, more likely to be south Asian and more likely to have a normal resting electrocardiogram than patients with angina who had the primary end point.
conclusionRACPCs are successful in identifying patients with incident angina who are at high coronary risk, but there is a need to reduce misdiagnosis and improve outcomes in patients diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain who accounted for nearly one third of cardiac events during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.