Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16790405›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2006

The evolution of hexapod engrailed-family genes: evidence for conservation and concerted evolution.

Andrew D Peel, Maximilian J Telford, Michael Akam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Development of the Pre-gnathal Segments in the Milkweed BugFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Mimicry diversification inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dynamics of growth zone patterning in the milkweed bugDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
  10. New genes from old: asymmetric divergence of gene duplicates and the evolution of development.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew D PeelLaboratory for Development and Evolution, Department of Zoology, University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, UK. apeel@imbb.forth.gr
Maximilian J Telford
Michael Akam

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses imply that multiple engrailed-family gene duplications occurred during hexapod evolution, a view supported by previous reports of only a single engrailed-family gene in members of the grasshopper genus Schistocerca and in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Here, we report the cloning of a second engrailed-family gene from Schistocerca gregaria and present evidence for two engrailed-family genes from four additional hexapod species. We also report the existence of a second engrailed-family gene in the Tribolium genome. We suggest that the engrailed and invected genes of Drosophila melanogaster have existed as a conserved gene cassette throughout holometabolous insect evolution. In total 11 phylogenetically diverse hexapod orders are now known to contain species that possess two engrailed-family paralogues, with in each case only one paralogue encoding the RS-motif, a characteristic feature of holometabolous insect invected proteins. We propose that the homeoboxes of hexapod engrailed-family paralogues are evolving in a concerted fashion, resulting in gene trees that overestimate the frequency of gene duplication. We present new phylogenetic analyses using non-homeodomain amino acid sequence that support this view. The S. gregaria engrailed-family paralogues provide strong evidence that concerted evolution might in part be explained by recurrent gene conversion. Finally, we hypothesize that the RS-motif is part of a serine-rich domain targeted for phosphorylation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMultigene FamilyAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceCloning, MolecularConserved SequenceDrosophilaGene DuplicationGenome, InsectGrasshoppersHomeodomain ProteinsInsect ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyHomeodomain ProteinsInsect ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16790405
PMCPMC1634793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.