ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2006
[Scleroderma associated autoantibodies - clinical and diagnostic relevance].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Recommendations of the Laboratory Commission of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) on further training of rheumatologists in the field of rheumatological and immunological laboratory diagnostics].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2012Article
- A novel automated indirect immunofluorescence autoantibody evaluation.Clinical rheumatology · 2012Article
- [Laboratory diagnostics for systemic sclerosis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In systemic sclerosis (SSc) and its variants, autoantibodies are the best known immunological aberration. In more than 95% of the patients, antinuclear antibodies or other autoantibodies can be detected. In about 90% of SSc patients with antinuclear antibodies, scleroderma associated autoantibodies highly specific for systemic sclerosis are found. These autoantibodies usually exclude each other in individual patients, and they are detectable early, persisting during the course of the disease. SSc patients characterized by scleroderma associated autoantibodies belong to disease subsets which are relatively homogeneous in clinical, genetic and prognostic terms. Besides these diagnostically relevant autoantibodies, numerous additional ones have also been described. These are neither SSc specific nor mutually exclusive, and their antigens have only been partially characterized. Some, however, are thought to be relevant to the as yet unanswered question of whether autoantibodies are directly involved in SSc pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16788839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.