Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16788837›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2006

Factors affecting outdoor exposure in winter: population-based study.

Tiina M Mäkinen, Veli-Pekka Raatikka, Mika Rytkönen, Jari Jokelainen, Hannu Rintamäki, Reija Ruuhela, Simo Näyhä, Juhani Hassi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Lack of guidelines for cold exposure among vulnerable outdoor workers.International journal of circumpolar health · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A prospective study on local cold injuries in northern Sweden.International journal of circumpolar health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neurovascular hand symptoms in relation to cold exposure in northern Sweden: a population-based study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2017
    Article
  11. Past, present and future of the climate and human health commission.International journal of biometeorology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The UTCI-clothing model.International journal of biometeorology · 2012
    Article
  17. Weather impacts on leisure activities in Halifax, Nova Scotia.International journal of biometeorology · 2011
    Article
  18. Frostbites in circumpolar areas.Global health action · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tiina M MäkinenCentre for Arctic Medicine, Thule Institute, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 5000, 90014, University of Oulu, Finland. tiina.makinen@oulu.fi
Veli-Pekka Raatikka
Mika Rytkönen
Jari Jokelainen
Hannu Rintamäki
Reija Ruuhela
Simo Näyhä
Juhani Hassi
University of Oulu · FIFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIFinnish Meteorological Institute · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent of outdoor exposure during winter and factors affecting it were examined in a cross-sectional population study in Finland. Men and women aged 25-74 years from the National FINRISK 2002 sub-study (n=6,591) were queried about their average weekly occupational, leisure-time and total cold exposure during the past winter. The effects of gender, age, area of residence, occupation, ambient temperature, self-rated health, physical activity and education on cold exposure were analysed. The self-reported median total cold exposure time was 7 h/week (8 h men, 6 h women),<1 h/week (2 h men, 0 h women) at work, 4 h/week (5 h men, 4 h women) during leisure time and 1 h/week (1 h men, 1.5 h women) while commuting to work. Factors associated with increased occupational cold exposure among men were: being employed in agriculture, forestry and industry/mining/construction or related occupations, being less educated and being aged 55-64 years. Factors associated with increased leisure-time cold exposure among men were: employment in industry/mining/construction or related occupations, being a pensioner or unemployed, reporting at least average health, being physically active and having college or vocational education. Among women, being a housewife, pensioner or unemployed and engaged in physical activity increased leisure-time cold exposure, and young women were more exposed than older ones. Self-rated health was positively associated with leisure time cold exposure in men and only to a minor extent in women. In conclusion, the subjects reported spending 4% of their total time under cold exposure, most of it (71%) during leisure time. Both occupational and leisure-time cold exposure is greater among men than women.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCold ClimateCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureSeasonsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID16788837
OpenAlexW2023174027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.