ReviewInternational journal of hematology2006
Genomic alterations in Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular profiling of cell-free DNA from classic Hodgkin lymphoma patients identifies potential prognostic clusters and corresponds with disease dynamics.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Genomic Landscape of Hodgkin Lymphoma.Cancers · 2021Review
- Review
- Mechanisms underlying the association between obesity and Hodgkin lymphoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016Review
- Recent Advances in the Pathobiology of Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Potential Impact on Diagnostic, Predictive, and Therapeutic Strategies.Advances in hematology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytogenetic analysis of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is hampered by the scarcity of neoplastic cells within a sea of reactive cells. There is accumulating evidence that HL represents 2 disease entities, classic HL (cHL) with its morphologic variants and nodular lymphocyte predominant HL (NLPHL). This subdivision, initially worked out in morphologic and immunohistochemical studies, has been further substantiated by molecular cytogenetic investigations. Two recurrent chromosomal aberrations, namely gains of 2p13-p16 and 9p24, have been found by comparative genomic hybridization analysis in microdissected cells from cHL patients as well as in cHL cell lines, but not in NLPHL cells. The available cHL cell lines are remarkably heterogeneous in their karyotypes, suggesting profound genomic instability leading to numeric chromosomal aberration and multiple chromosomal breaks and translocations. In this article, we review genomic aberrations that may contribute to the development and maintenance of the morphologic and clinical presentation of these beta-cell lymphoma entities. Furthermore, we delineate current data on the genomic changes observed in the neoplastic cells of HL that are created by epigenetic mechanisms, which are alternative mechanisms that regulate the expression of relevant genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.