ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2006
Modelling of aerobic and anaerobic energy production during exhaustive exercise on a cycle ergometer.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Oxygen Uptake Plateau-A Critical Review of the Frequently Misunderstood Phenomenon.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Review
- A comparison of modelling procedures used to estimate the power-exhaustion time relationship.European journal of applied physiology · 2010Article
- Modeling energy expenditure and oxygen consumption in human exposure models: accounting for fatigue and EPOC.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2008Article
- The critical velocity in swimming.European journal of applied physiology · 2008Article
- Modelling of aerobic and anaerobic energy production in middle-distance running.European journal of applied physiology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An extension of the original hyperbolic model (Model-2) was proposed by using power output required to elicit maximal oxygen uptake (Pt). This study aimed to test this new model (Model-alpha) using mechanical work produced during cycle ergometry. Model alpha assumed that power exceeding a critical power (Pc) was met partly by the anaerobic metabolism. The parameter alpha was the proportion of the power exceeding Pc provided by anaerobic metabolism, while power exceeding Pt was exclusively met by anaerobic metabolism. Aerobic power was assumed to rise monoexponentially with a time constant tau. The exhaustion was assumed to be reached when the anaerobic work capacity W' was entirely utilised. Twelve subjects performed one progressive ramp test to assess the power at ventilatory threshold (P(VT)) and Pt and five constant-load exercise to exhaustion within 2-30 min, with one to estimate the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD). Parameters from Model alpha were fitted with tau equal to 0, 10, 20 and 30 s. Results in goodness-of-fit was better than Model-2 whatever the value assumed for tau (P < 0.05). The value of tau did not affect much the estimates for P (c) and alpha. P (c) estimates were significantly correlated with Pc from Model-2 and with P(VT). W' estimates, which were dependent on the value ascribed to tau, were not statistically different than MAOD. These two variables were, however, not significantly correlated. In conclusion, Model alpha could provide useful information on the critical power and the anaerobic contribution according to exercise intensity, whereas W' estimates should be used with care because of the sensitivity to the assumption on aerobic power kinetics tau.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16786356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.