ReviewNeurotoxicity research2006
Botulinum neurotoxin - from laboratory to bedside.
Review in Neurotoxicity research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Botulinum Toxin for Treating Temporomandibular Disorders: What is the Evidence?Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2022Article
- Engineering Botulinum Neurotoxins for Enhanced Therapeutic Applications and Vaccine Development.Toxins · 2020Review
- Botulinum Toxin Type A-A Modulator of Spinal Neuron-Glia Interactions under Neuropathic Pain Conditions.Toxins · 2018Review
- Botulinum neurotoxin formulations: overcoming the confusion.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2018Review
- The Practical Use of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Aesthetics.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2017Review
- A Cell Line for Detection of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type B.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Article
- Diffusion of botulinum toxins.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2012Article
- [Botulinum toxin in the treatment of adult spasticity. An interdisciplinary German 10-point consensus 2010].Der Nervenarzt · 2011Article
- Sensitive and quantitative detection of botulinum neurotoxin in neurons derived from mouse embryonic stem cells.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2011Article
- Article
- Review
- Unilateral versus bilateral thyroarytenoid Botulinum toxin injections in adductor spasmodic dysphonia: a prospective study.Head & face medicine · 2009Article
- Long-distance retrograde effects of botulinum neurotoxin A.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008Article
- Botulinum neurotoxin: evolution from poison, to research tool--onto medicinal therapeutic and future pharmaceutical panacea.Neurotoxicity research · 2007Review
- A neuronal cell-based botulinum neurotoxin assay for highly sensitive and specific detection of neutralizing serum antibodies.FEBS letters · 2007Article
- Pharmacological differences and clinical implications of various botulinum toxin preparations: a critical appraisal.Functional neurologyReview
- The analgesic effects of botulinum neurotoxin by modulating pain-related receptors; A literature review.Molecular painReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has been used clinically since 1980, with an ever-increasing range of clinical applications. This has coincided with a period of massively expanded interest in the underlying biology of the neurotoxin. Tremendous advances have taken place in the scientific understanding of neurotoxin structure and function since the description of their endopeptidase activity in 1992. These developments have led to an increased understanding of the mechanisms underpinning the clinical use of the neurotoxins and also in the technologies available to support their clinical use. The expanding range of clinical applications, and use in increasing doses, has also generated challenges for the clinicians and manufacturers of BoNT preparations to ensure continuing efficacy and safety margins for these new clinical settings. To date the increased clinical use of BoNTs has occurred largely empirically, and not by application of the recent insights into neurotoxin structure and function. With the increased knowledge regarding the biology of the neurotoxins, however, there is the opportunity to select preferred forms of the toxin for particular clinical applications and even to consider engineering the neurotoxins to produce modified products more suited to specific clinical applications. These developments and opportunities that have arisen, particularly over the last decade, emphasise the increasing need to maintain an active two way dialogue between clinicians and basic scientists to ensure that the advances in the laboratory are translated into clinical benefit and that the clinical developments in use of neurotoxin are supported by the scientific research activity. This article is based upon presentations given in a workshop at the 5th International Conference on Basic and Therapeutic Aspects of Botulinum and Tetanus Toxin in Denver in June, 2005 seeking to address issues relating to the laboratory/clinic interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16785110What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.